The Delhi HC has stated that there is no such legislation envisaged under the law to put any restraint on free communication during the process of elections, after refusing an interim relief to a contestant seeking the ex-parte removal of allegedly defamatory content against him.
The order was passed by Justice Raji Sahai Endlaw in a plea by a contestant for the Delhi Legislative Assembly Election, 2020, SC Vats (Plaintiff), where the plaintiff has instituted this suit against many unknown parties to restraint them from publishing any defamatory content against him. Vats was allegedly registered in a rape case in the year 2015.Subsequently, he was discharged off the offence of rape. However, the case was remitted for the trial of other offences, for which, Vats has not been charged as yet and the case in pending.
The plaintiff contended that once he has been discharged of the charge of rape, the content was ex facie defamatory and his chances in the ensuing election were hampered.
The Court noted that although the Plaintiff had been discharged of the offence under Section 376, he was still an accused with respect to other offences under IPC, to which the court opined that it could not pass any order directing the dissection of the allegedly defamatory material.
“It is up to the plaintiff to inform its electorate that he has been discharged of the offence under Section 376 IPC.”
- Delhi HC
Further, the court observed that in view of the complaint made by the plaintiff, no case was made out for grant of ex-parte order and said that even though discharged of the offence, the plaintiff only has the right to issue a clarification to the electorate and cannot seek to obliterate the said information.
“It has been held that during election and campaigning for elections, a lot of claims and speeches are made and at least the candidates contesting the election cannot be bound by the promises made by them to the electorate and on the same parity, I feel that any restraint on free communication during the process of election is not envisaged under the law relating to elections.”
- Delhi HC
Acquittal of man wrongfully convicted for murder nearly 36 years ago – SC
Non-Approval of Law Degree; Faculty of Law, DU students protest
Bail applications to be disposed of Expeditiously - SC
Voter ID unobjectionable proof of Citizenship – Mumbai Court
DHCBA Resolves for strike against Collegium’s Recommendation
Notice on Plea against illegal Burning of Bio-Medical Waste - SC
Death Warrants For Hanging Of 4 Convicts On March 3 – Patiala House Court
Permanent Commission for Women Officers - SC
Proposed Web Rules to Threaten the anonymity of Social Media users
Contempt Notices to Telecos for Non-Payment of AGR Dues - SC
New Label for Healthier Snack - FSSAI
Abettor In Rape Case Will Face Same Punishment As Rape Accused – Bombay HC
Adani Transmission and Tata Power are in converse with ESSEL Group to buy Power Line
Muzaffarpur Shelter Home: Brajesh Thakur and 10 others sentenced to Life Imprisonment – Saket Court
CSAC urges SC to Stops trial of WhatsApp Pay
Notice to Centre and Police on Plea for Removal of Shaheen Bagh Protestors - SC
Sabarimala Reference : New Issues Framed
Constitutionality of SC/ST Amendment Act Upheld - SC
Grave Punishment for Ads promoting False Claims – Government
Nityananda’s Bail cancelled – Karnataka HC